Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Summer Olympics on NBC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to NBC Olympic broadcasts. J04n(talk page) 18:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Summer Olympics on NBC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No need for a separate article on one broadcaster's coverage of the event. No substantial coverage to pass WP:GNG on this highly specific topic. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to NBC Olympic broadcasts This has coverage for all the broadcasts they have done and highlights any notable media-specific items. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302 you might want to nominate the 2018 Winter Olympics on NBC as well. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for exactly the same reasons:

Delete Article is redundant as linked above and the bulk of the article is just focused on a criticism of NBC's coverage rather than the coverage itself.UnteenthSense (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC) — Striking per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per AngusWOOF. Some information belongs there, and the redirect would be helpful for readers to find it. But there's no reason to have a separate article for each year. Smartyllama (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that a total of two articles are nominated for deletion herein.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.